The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you could take 100 individuals and simultaneously expose them to the same traumatic event but without knowing what their antecedent history is right right so what have what else has this person experienced and um so in other words what else has been dropped in the soil right and without knowing the composition of each of their soils you really have no idea how those 100 people are going going to react to an identical stimulus
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.