The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So a lot of the stuff we’ve talk about, right? So all the inflammation stuff we’ve talked about is in there. All the evolutionary stuff we’ve talked about is in there. A lot of stuff about the risk factors for depression is in there. And then if you wanna take just a very deep dive into the neurobiology of depression, a lot about, you know, kind of wide scale brain abnormalities and depression, molecular abnormalities and depression.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.