The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we had to through a process of inquiry we had to stumble across something that didn't make sense right so when I learned this person loves music and I've got that in my head right this what this person does they listen to music when they're home and and and they have this really long drive and then I learned they're not listening to music and then it just makes me then I become curious about that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so then when I point that out you're taking a longer drive and not doing something you enjoy in order to punish yourself well now we have curiosity about that