The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So, there's this That's why it's fun to work with families cuz you'll see the toxic kid, the toxic mom, the toxic grandma. I've been I've been fortunate to work with several generations, and it's crazy to see the same mycotoxins. Like, is that just coincidence, or is that literally through the family line? And then you plot the the family toxicity with the mental illness. Oh, she was depressed and anxious, so was she, so was she.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.