The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's very perverse i mean textual communication there's no nuance there's no context like you ever gotten a text from somebody like yeah i could go one way or the other way and you're you don't know what they're saying they're like do they mean it bad or what if they respond in a short message you're like oh man like he's maybe he's busy you don't know like it's just
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.