The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
playing with them in a truly engaged way so that means at least for my two youngest that's on the floor like they're not on the floor yeah you have to be on the floor on the floor yeah you have to be on the floor and you have to be doing exactly what they're doing you you can't be half doing it that is a real antidote to sort of rumination in that negative loop
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but it's also not easy to do initially it turns out to be a bit of a shock to your system because we i think lose this ability to play pretty quickly it fades from us you know by the time we're adults we've sort of lost we don't know what that means anymore so it's actually a beautiful thing