The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
now that can come from outside of us and that's very striking when it comes to outside of us and and it does often it's not striking and rare it's striking and relatively frequent it can also come inside of us now there's probably some external modeling but it can come inside of us where I decide the way I'm going to be good enough is I'm going to berate myself and torment myself until I'm perfect
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
now there's probably some external modeling but it can come inside of us where I decide the way I'm going to be good enough is I'm going to berate myself and torment myself until I'm perfect