The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the questions then become number one what causes neuroinflammation and number two how do we correct that how do we treat that neural inflammation either with a pharmaceutical or with a dietary intervention if indeed dietary is a major factor in what is causing that neural inflammation in the first place
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
or is it that inflammation in the brain may trigger depression anxiety or even eating disorders in those who are susceptible in those whose achilles heel is that mental illness manifestation
I mean a lot of mental illness, a lot of mental health stuff is related to neuroinflammation, which can be connected with food, it can be connected with nutrient deficiencies, it can be connected with toxin exposures. All this kind of stuff is likely very fixable if you're willing to get help.