The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's perhaps you could you could see almost depression as a as a hack a bad hack maybe one that's not fully evolved yet just like mania not fully evolved yet not under all the right controls to make it more generally suitable and reasonable depression the easiest way to make it happen is to remove the joy to remove the energy to seek out reward and then you've got an organism that's going to be passive that doesn't see a path to to to something positive
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.