The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but most importantly it's it's presenting in a setting where there can be what's called a holding environment right the reason that we can do these things that are very very frightening is because we establish rapport with someone who we feel and believe wants to help us is capable of helping us doesn't want to look
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but if you look at primary predictors of success it lies in the Rapport because the Rapport the trust the mutuality that's generated is what creates that again that thing that's called a holding environment which she like I'm really I'm scared of this and it's intimidating but like I'm going to come here and this is a safe environment and you're a safe person and you want to help me right and I don't feel bad when I'm sitting across from you which is why me and most of the people I work with if not all acknowledge our own trauma