The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
part of what lets you do that it's the exposure to the outside person who you trust because and that person becomes a barometer what's Real and True here and then it helps us get our own minds into place like oh right right okay I do get this right it is okay that I'm not perfect I do not want to beat up on anyone like this including myself
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.