Paul Saladino· MD
If you were the other end and you were stressed out and all that kind of stuff and relationships weren't good or you're in a bad place, then your risk of getting a cold when you were exposed was two two in three.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
If you were the other end and you were stressed out and all that kind of stuff and relationships weren't good or you're in a bad place, then your risk of getting a cold when you were exposed was two two in three.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And they found that if you were in a really good place mentally and least stressed, your risk of getting a cold when actually having symptomatic cold symptoms, being exposed to the cold virus, was one in three.