The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
But when you're just entertaining yourself on social media, you should be learning and laughing. You should be following accounts that teach you something. that's life affirming about science, about books, about art, about whatever it happens to be that you're interested in and the stuff that you actually find funny.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
It's to curate the experience through in a way that's life affirming as opposed to life diminishing. And so the two things that people should actually be doing with social media are learning and laughing