The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's hard to do it is hard to do and I remember there was a podcast that there was someone that Tim Ferriss had on his podcast god I want to say like a year and a half ago I forgot the name of the person but hopefully we'll find it for the shownotes it was a really good episode on saying no and I remember that was actually the first time I started really contemplating it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.