Peter Attia· MD
because then at least their brains not being exposed to the media as much and they're finding that wow there are certain things that we're doing that are actually enjoyable that don't involve a device
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
because then at least their brains not being exposed to the media as much and they're finding that wow there are certain things that we're doing that are actually enjoyable that don't involve a device
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
this is obviously if they're idle time is focused on a media device what are the things can they do with their idle time like what are the other hobbies what are the other things we can instill