The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
people are the way they are and so that basically is saying they don't have for you will write so I would have to goo that there's and you can have some level of influence on it but you've got a person on your team and they have a certain type of attitude and you can move it a little bit to the left or to the right you can give a little bit of course correction but they're gonna be that person
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.