The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
even still you know if you if you measure twenty things in some blood you can have a much better idea of what's going on what probably happened then if you measure one thing in that blood I should say 20 things in the pathway right yeah yeah and and and what you can get by measuring serially even a few serial measurements can be quite helpful
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.