Paul Saladino· MD
If your doctor interprets your "cholesterol" without also getting a fasting insulin level or thinking about your underlying metabolic health you need a new doctor.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
If your doctor interprets your "cholesterol" without also getting a fasting insulin level or thinking about your underlying metabolic health you need a new doctor.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
If you want to know your cardiac risk, know how metabolically healthy you are (start with aforementiuoned labs) to give your "cholesterol" level context.
If you want to know your cardiac risk, know how metabolically healthy you are to give your "cholesterol" level context.
if you added triglycerides to this if you added fasting insulin to this if you added fasting glucose to this what other data points would come out of this start to look at ldl in a context and everything looks differently