The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
yeah i think there's one most important principle and that's when it's there use it up and so you know in a physics speak you could say this is a linear consumption of circulating metabolites or in chemistry speak people call this mass action just whatever mass is there you tend to take it in
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
yeah i think there's one most important principle and that's when it's there use it up