The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the body wants to maintain homeostasis it wants to defend um it wants to defend energy expenditure and keep that in a certain range so if you exercise more right your body will adjust other stuff so you keep you actually keep the total energy expenditure the same
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it became this you know really important i think observation about how the body's trying to homeostatically it seems keep total energy expenditure kind of in a pretty narrow band in the same way that you try to keep you know body temperature in a pretty narrow band your body's actually trying to kind of clamp that and doesn't let it go too far either way
how the body is trying to homeostatically it seems keep total energy expenditure kind of in a pretty narrow band in the same way that you try to keep you know body temperature in a pretty narrow band