Rhonda Patrick· PhD
It was basically shunting glucose away from tumors.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
It was basically shunting glucose away from tumors.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I mean even if you're someone that who who is obese and you're exercising and you're increasing glucose uptake into your muscle I mean that's that's very beneficial to not have it then available for a lot of cancer cells you know which you primarily do use glucose for for fuel
how exercise is you know how it's playing a role in cancer prevention and you know affecting tumor biology through metabolic signals I mean glucose regulation being a big one right