The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
these are condensed just so energy rich these Foods they're overwhelming our cellular machinery and so it's not only breaking the Machinery but a lot of it's being stored as sort of toxic byproducts like intracellular lipids and things like that that kind of like disrupt the whole cell signaling ceramides Dio glycerols like Jerry shman wrote this amazing paper
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the ultraprocessed food is literally designed to make us eat more calories and be insatiable on top of the fact so you get people eating more food the food is not then supporting on the cellular level the actual processing of that food because it's micronutrient poror and it's it's very destructive to our cellular biology with all the food additives
these are obviously hyper palatable and they are so nutrient-dense that they're leading to this process called chronic overnutrition so they're putting nutrient stress on our cells our cells can handle a certain amount of sugar and a certain amount of fat and you know our our bodies have to process every little macronutrient that comes in and do something with it but because these are condensed just so energy rich these Foods they're overwhelming our cellular machinery and so it's not only breaking the Machinery but a lot of it's being stored as sort of toxic byproducts like intracellular lipids and things like that that kind of like disrupt the whole cell signaling ceramides Dio glycerols