We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
I generally advise men to undergo surgery whenever possible... I think it pales in comparison to the downside in in what I see from men that undergo chemical castration the metabolic syndrome and the metabolic derangement that follows from being hypogonadal
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the metabolic syndrome yes and the metabolic derangement that follows yeah from being hypogonadal Beyond hypogonal they're basically eugenatal um not to mention the complications of bleeding that followed the radiation so um again I'm sure there's you know lots of medical oncologists and radio oncologists that are listening to me now wanting to put arrows into the back of my head but I don't think I'm speaking with just a surgeon's bias I think I'm speaking from watching Men in the years that follow undergo complete metabolic destruction