The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So the more skeletal muscle you have, the more easily you can buffer blood sugar. Maintaining low blood sugar is an imperative part of reducing not just the risk of type 2 diabetes but more importantly I would say heart disease uh di um uh dementia and cancer.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think that the larger reservoir is important for a number of reasons. The metabolic component of muscle the, you know, as we all know, muscle is the primary site for glucose metabolism, also free fatty acids at rest. However, it enables her to have more dietary flexibility because when we think about nutritional sciences and we think about triglycerides, insulin, glucose, what we're really looking at is the health of skeletal muscle.