Paul Saladino· MD
at the center of metabolic dysfunction at the center of chronic disease are fat cells that are hypertrophic rather than hyperplastic meaning fat cells that are too big yes
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
at the center of metabolic dysfunction at the center of chronic disease are fat cells that are hypertrophic rather than hyperplastic meaning fat cells that are too big yes
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
It's just that that visceral cavity is so limited in volume that it only allows fat growth through hypertrophy because that is a way to limit the total amount of fat you can grow. If our visceral fat was able to grow through hyperlasia, then it may expand so much that it starts to compress our our tissues. It starts to squeeze the liver or squeeze the intestines or squeeze the kidneys. And so by only allowing visceral fat to grow through hypertrophy, you do limit how much it can grow, but it also becomes much more pro-inflammatory because hypertrophic fat cells release a lot more pro-inflammatory cytoines than smaller hyperlastic fat cells.