The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
muscle tissue is an energetically expensive tissue to maintain it takes more energy more atp more calories it is a feudal cycle meaning that to maintain it you actually have to increase synthesis and breakdown because you're having more proteins that are misfolded and whatnot that need to be broken down that whole thing takes more energy
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
muscle tissue is an energetically expensive tissue to maintain it takes more energy more atp more calories it is a feudal cycle meaning that to maintain it you actually have to increase synthesis and breakdown because you're having more proteins that are misfolded and whatnot that need to be broken down that whole thing takes more energy and so that's why we tell people if you want to be able to eat more calories hey build some more muscle because to maintain that takes more um