The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so the surprising part of their work wasn't that they found an oncogene but that this oncogene was actually a metabolism that what its role was basically to you know allow glucose into the cell and that you know thompson i think correctly states that this is the most fundamental thing that it does and that uh the proliferation you know is is downstream of this glucose uptake
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.