The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
The extreme example is the hibernating bear. We call it the honey bear often, right? Because in the fall, Not only do they eat every berry they can find in the woods, but they also climb up the trees and get to the honeybees. And they put on 150, maybe even 200 pounds within a period of two or three months. And then they go into extreme insulin resistance and they hibernate.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So we don't hibernate, but we probably became insulin resistant every fall 100,000 years ago in order to survive these periods of starvation.