The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's actually a term in the literature right now for the reverse of the triad those people would have low HDL and high triglycerides and typically a high preponderance of small dense LDL particles it's known as atherogenic dyslipidemia right and so you can actually look right now there's plenty of studies that show hey if you do have low HDL high triglycerides you're probably in trouble you're you're going to be more likely died
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.