The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you wanted to prove that a soft drink wasn't bad i could do a study where i would give the soft drinks to people but i would give it over you're only allowed to make a tiny sip every 10 minutes so it takes you three hours to drink a soft drink in that case the amount even though you're drinking a lot the concentration may never be never let the phosphate depletion get significant enough in magnitude that it really triggers amp-d
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.