The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
they don't have glycogen and it makes all the sense in the world because if you enter ICU first of all normally sorry when you say they don't have glycogen you mean liver glycogen muscle glycogen are depleted by how much and and depleted to what level yeah so let's say that let's say that you have 500 grams you know of of of glycogen um if you have a full High carbohy diet so that might not be the case of someone entering the ICU
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.