Peter Attia· MD
now that they defined this in people uh in this paper they then went to the animal model and they knocked out the gene that's causing the defect and they reproduce diabetes in the normal rat model uh Mouse model
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
now that they defined this in people uh in this paper they then went to the animal model and they knocked out the gene that's causing the defect and they reproduce diabetes in the normal rat model uh Mouse model
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.