The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
i called purdue university's nutrition program and asked one of the researchers there if they wanted to help me on just an early unfunded pilot study to prove my point looking at metabolic improvements and looking at financial improvements too
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i actually went about and spent an entire summer meeting with all the departments in our local med center and giving them a 15-minute slide presentation of when your patient comes back says that dr hallberg told them to eat a lot of fat and not a lot of carbohydrates that i wasn't crazy that this was actually based on evidence and here it was
i actually brought up a amendment that all patients with metabolic disease should at least be provided the option of trying this if they wanted and it passed unanimously
and actually met dr steve finney and that really changed the course of my life as well