Peter Attia· MD
so around the visera uh within the muscle itself self in the pancreas specifically which we can talk about maybe why that's so problematic pericardial fat tell us a little bit about why this is so problematic
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so around the visera uh within the muscle itself self in the pancreas specifically which we can talk about maybe why that's so problematic pericardial fat tell us a little bit about why this is so problematic
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so I talk about the places where it escapes so around the visera um within the muscle itself in the pancreas specifically which we can talk about maybe why that's so problematic pericardial fat
so I talk about the places where it escapes so around the viscera uh within the muscle itself in the pancreas specifically which we can talk about maybe why that's so problematic paracardial fat