The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and then the people with metabolic disease chronic inflammation metabolic syndrome right insulin resistance perhaps these people are not as good at repairing the arterial injury and then the plaque comes in to do that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
yes and and in a sense there's maybe it's just the optimist in me I see this as being possibly a very optimistic way of looking at it that perhaps a lot of people who think they're just a lost cause because they they're too far down the road it may be a it may be about focusing on regaining that reparative health