Peter Attia· MD
and that last one is kind of squirly because you know I can't point to one number that tells me like I can point to your apob I can point to your blood pressure you're either smoking or you're not smoking
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and that last one is kind of squirly because you know I can't point to one number that tells me like I can point to your apob I can point to your blood pressure you're either smoking or you're not smoking
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and that last one is kind of squirely because you know I can't point to one number that tells me like I can point to your apob I can point to your blood pressure you're either smoking or you're not smoking
and that last one is kind of squirly because you know I can't point to one number that tells me like I can point to your apob I can point your blood pressure you're either smoking or you're not smoking