Peter Attia· MD
if you look at respiratory quotient of people sleep-deprived versus not I'm sure RQ must be going up right I'm sure they're absolutely going after the wrong fuel partitioning that's exactly what you see
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you look at respiratory quotient of people sleep-deprived versus not I'm sure RQ must be going up right I'm sure they're absolutely going after the wrong fuel partitioning that's exactly what you see
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you look at respiratory quotient of people sleep deprived versus not i'm sure rq must be going up right i'm sure they're absolutely going after the wrong fuel partitioning