The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I like to see uric acid below 5.0 again most labs consider anything below 6 to be normal some some labs even consider anything below 7 to be normal and again I think in part that's because they're optimizing around the prevention of gout
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I like to see uric acid below 5.0 again most labs consider anything below 6 to be normal some some labs even consider anything below 7 to be normal and again I think in part that's because they're optimizing around the prevention of gout and it's very unlikely you're gonna have a gout attack with a uric acid of 6.2 however I think there are a number of other health consequences to that