We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
So, that's a mismatch. We're designed to be motivated to seek out these foods and we have to expend energy to get high calorie foods. say like we would have maybe gotten honey and that would have been super rewarding and we only would have had a little bit and then we would have ran around and spent those calories and now we have you know you can just get your chocolate bar. So that's a mismatch situation that's maladaptive.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.