The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So, the whole conversation here is around metabolism. So, how hot is your furnace burning? And I think that people like Ray Pete have forwarded this notion which I think is correct that if you want to be a healthy, vital, viral, fertile, warm human, you want your metabolism to be functioning well. You want your furnace to be burning hot.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.