We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
I think there were a lot of holes in the banister study um and I think they center around methodology so something called informative sensoring where the patients who were in The metformin diabetes arm um were censored out of the analysis that demonstrated A reduced mortality if they were lost to followup um if they died or uh pardon me um if they um or if they had a medication change
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.