The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and by the way there's another bunch of people who came to tell the FDA that they should allow meat forming for pre-diabetes because the DPP said your Foreman prevents diabetes by 30% and the FDA said well if you think that's important why don't you make the diagnosis of diabetes in five point eight a modeling agency
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.