The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we've known that one of met Foreman's main effects is to quote unquote poison mitochondria it inhibits a group of proteins that generates energy in mitochondria and the response of the body when it has a bit of inhibition of this is to say wow I'm low on energy let's build up those factories
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Is it the inhibition of complex II? in the mitochondria and it's simply reducing mitochondrial efficiency. If you picture a curve where the x-axis is mitochondrial function, it's just moving you to the left.
it binds to er to a complex in the mitochondria it probably affects complex one and also complex three it's not totally clear