The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so they were they had some efficacy but it wasn't like the five strain formulation so my uh co- founder and bio statistician would would say you know that was not statistically significant and the data is published so anybody can go look at it I would say it looked like it was in between the placebo and the five strain formulation but in any case but it could have been very underpowered and that's why you didn't see a difference it also could have been very underpowered yeah
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.