The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i do think tanir's point every drug that has a biologic effect has a side effect and so if you use two drugs that have a biologic effect you're just going to get more side effects so you got to make sure that the benefits outweighing the risks let me give you an example if both of them are enhancing autophagy okay which is good and it's synergistic but the patient has cancer then it's when we want to stop autophagy
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.