The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
that when the patients got hyperglycemia, that the endocrinologist would judge was not tolerable, that they would ensure that if the patient could not be managed on metformin, that they would have to go off the trial. In other words, I didn't want them being given insulin. I didn't want them to be given insulin or an insulin secretagogue, which also raises serum insulin.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.