I think the tame trial has actually been mostly a positive in that sense or the proposed tame trial I should say
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
I think the tame trial has actually been mostly a positive in that sense or the proposed tame trial I should say
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so it seems to me that the biggest challenge here is not the funding it's not the study design it's the conceptual leap it's it's a completely different paradigm of how we think about delaying death
and I'm not going to get to the FDA with the indication for aging
our hypothesis is that the the aging part of your biology doesn't stop working when you had your first disease it's still going to get your next disease okay and if we think biologically like that we should be able to intervene as we do with animals quite late also