The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
well we are discussing now we were planning 3000 our powers based on 3 000 subjects but we might have enough money to increase to 3500 subjects with the hope that it might accelerate our results it's not necessarily so it's possible that you need the time that you need but it's 3 000 subjects now but could be more later
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
how many centers you said 30 3 500 subjects yeah we well we have if currently before before we get okay to expand the beat we have 14 centers and about 250 people in each centers all in the u.s all in the us