The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I think the microbiome stuff is not even understood by anybody again you get ber for Being Suit I I was Harvard legitimate Harvard doctor within the past year said the microbiome talk is pseudoscience right because there's not a lot of study on that but the you know when you look at the amount of hormones that are controlled by this trillions of uh different gut bacteria that we don't even understand
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.