The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
These electrons reacting with oxygen can generate these um byproducts called radical oxygen species which are highly reactive. Right? So they're not chemically stable the way we think of a normal atom of oxygen. No. And so they tend to react with proteins with fatty acid and they induce lesions.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
These electrons reacting with oxygen can generate these um byproducts called radical oxygen species which are highly reactive. Right? So they're not chemically stable the way we think of a normal atom of oxygen. No. And so they tend to react with proteins with fatty acid and they induce lesions.